Saturday, February 6, 2016

Book Review: "Age of Iron" by J.M. Coetzee


Age of Iron (1990)

5 Stars out of 5

J.M. Coetzee

198 pages

J.M. Coetzee had prior to the publication of “Age of Iron” (1990) written five novels. This South African academic had already won his first Booker Prize in 1983 for “The Life and Times of Michael K”. Coetzee would go on to win another Booker Prize for “Disgrace” in 1999 (the first ever to receive two Booker prizes) and a Nobel Prize for Literature in 2003. The Nobel committee commented at the time on Coetzee’s use of the “involvement of the outsider” along with his “well-crafted composition, pregnant dialog and analytical brilliance” in his work. All of these elements are to be found in “Age of Iron” along with Coetzee’s life-long focus on violence as it is manifested in the imperialistic and colonialist mentality of the Western World.

Coetzee explores his concerns about the plight of those that cannot defend themselves via the use of allegorical techniques in many of his novels; “Age of Iron” continues this pattern. The novel is superficially a long letter from a dying South African white woman, Mrs. Curren to her long-departed daughter in America. She has just learned from her doctors that her losing battle with cancer is nearing its end. After she returns home from the doctor's office, she spots a homeless man lying in the alley behind her house. She invites the dirty and drunken Mr. Vercueil into her home and into her life. Initially distant in mind and position, Mrs. Curren slowly proceeds to open herself emotionally and philosophically to Vercueil. She is a former Classics teacher, he a former seaman. She talks incessantly (but not unwisely), he hardly at all. From a symbolic sense, she may represent the silent, liberal wings of apartheid South Africa (the years of this story are 1986 to 1989 – five years before the end of Apartheid), while Vercueil may be the equally silent, but indifferent wing of that same society. These are the guilty people of South Africa; not guilty of actively suppressing the majority black people. No, not guilty of active suppression; they are the ones guilty of tolerating and turning their silent gazes away and thus allowing the system to flourish far longer than it ever should have.

Mrs. Curren employs within her household a housekeeper, Florence, Florence is a black South African and the mother of two little girls and an adolescent boy, Bheki. Bheki is away to school as the “Age of Iron” opens. He soon comes home with a boy we later learn is named John. Bheki and John represent the black youth of course, but also as the reader progresses are shown to be the “Iron” of the book’s title. The boys are caught up in the growing violence of the times, and will act in several ways to propel Mrs. Curren’s personal evolution. As the boys situation becomes more dire with respect to the police, Mrs. Curren’s eyes begin to open to the situation of the blacks with whom she “shares” her country. That she and her white compatriots don’t really share the country has long been known to her, but just what the whites do share with blacks is only now becoming all too dreadfully clear to her. Yet as she still fails to fully understand the narrowness of black South Africans' choices or the world they inhabit, she continues to argue against the movement towards violence these two young men appear to be making. Early in her dawning awareness of the black world her housekeeper lives in, she asks Florence, how can she ignore the danger Bheki is in? Florence responds “that the children are like iron, we are proud of them.” Her answer seems to be for a different question and is completely incomprehensible to Mrs. Curren.

As the violence ramps up and Mrs. Curren continues her various arguments with the black people she meets, she slowly begins to realize another fact: her opinions don’t matter because she is a woman; worse, an old woman; and most worst of all, an old white woman. The use by Coetzee of this image is one he has commented on outside his books: the sense that the black people in South Africa live in a land invisible to him. It is equally interesting to me that Coetzee as a man has chosen to inhabit the mind of a woman in “Age of Iron”. It seems another attempt by him as he tries to imagine the inner life of a woman, another attempt to understand yet another group of the historically disenfranchised segments of society.

Coetzee is also well known for occasionally incorporating his own life into his allegories. His mother, a woman of German ancestry and a school teacher might be a model for Mrs. Curren. Vercueil’s model then would presumably be Coetzee’s Afrikaner father. Whether his father was as silent as the fictional Vercueil is not known to me, though others have commented that Coetzee himself is notorious for his taciturnity. Coetzee is also known to be a teetotaler and a vegan; not good models for the alcoholic Vercueil. Whether Coetzee has brought his family’s superficialities into this story or not is really not the main thrust of the book Rather it is whether or not he has brought in the attitudes and value systems of the Afrikaners he grew up with is the real point of the book. To judge by comments made by Coetzee following the publication of some of this other novels, it is clear he feels passionate about the plight of those that cannot defend themselves.

Coetzee has also publically stated that "there is only one true myth, the myth of the survivor on a desert island”. Coetzee went so far as to have one of his characters state his desire for solitude and to stand outside history by declaring “I don’t like accomplices. God let me be alone.” Wondering about these hermitic thoughts of Coetzee makes me really wonder at the origins for the fervor Coetzee clearly feels for the powerless. The theme in “Age of Iron” of a bridgeless chasm between white and black, of the world the blacks live in that is so foreign to the whites that it seems incomprehensively alien suggests compassion and empathy that are terribly foreign to that desert island-loving author. Yet, go into this theme he does with “Age of Iron”, and while it seems like a choice that is an obvious one for a South African (or American) to dig into, there are but only a very few cases in literature that anyone has delved into it as elegantly as Coetzee does.

J.M. Coetzee has written as of 2016 twelve novels and four fictionalized memoirs, most including the theme of the indifferent or clueless powerful in contrast to the powerless. He first tried his deft hand on these topics in 1974 with “Dusklands” where he draws implied parallels between America’s war in Viet Nam and South Africa’s actions in 18th Century Africa. He displayed his growing artistic genius with the tale of the deformed Michael K in 1983’s “The Life and Times of Michael K”. In each of these novels as with “Age of Iron”, Coetzee has found a way to explore his chosen theme with new, insightful literary techniques. While the heart of Coetzee’s work may well lie in a concern over the helpless, the art of Coetzee’s work lies in the clever construction and elegant language used in his writing. “Age of Iron” is an excellent introduction to him, his themes and subject choices. I strongly recommend it to anyone interested in the oppressed, how oppression can be active or passive, and in stories told at a very rarefied level of subtlety in style and language.

No comments:

Post a Comment