The Revenant (2015)
R
4.5 Stars out of 5
Director Alejandro Gonzalez Iñárritu
Writer Mark
Smith, Alejandro Gonzalez Iñárritu (s'play); Michael Punke (book)Cinematography Emmanuel Lubezki
Music Carsten Nicolai, Ryuichi Sakamoto
Leonardo DiCaprio Hugh Glass
Tom Hardy John Fitzgerald
Domhnall Gleeson Captain Andrew Henry
Will Poulter Jim Bridger
Forrest Goodluck Hawk
Arthur Redcloud Hikuc
It is my opinion that Iñárritu has produced a movie that has
deep parallels with Alfonso Cuarón’s 2013 movie, “Gravity”. Both use Lubezki as
their cinematographer, and the two movies are mesmerizing in similar ways: “Gravity”
opens with Sandra Bulloch flying through space in a dizzying spin following a
collision with space debris, while “The Revenant starts with an attack of
Ariakara warriors on a group of white trappers. Both movies employ state of the
art camera work that takes the audience straight into the middle of the action.
However as good and as similar as the cinematography is in both films, it is the
screenplays that make me think of the parallels more than anything else. While
both films require expert physical acting by the two leading stars, it is the
trip to “salvation” that both take that is the most definitive of their resemblance.
Bulloch’s character will race from one life-threatening situation to another,
while DiCaprio’s will do exactly the same. One might be in space, the other in
the mountains, but there is a strong likeness of dramatic tension and relief;
each movie will do it yet one more time, again and again. One big difference is
their final destination: Bulloch’s character is “saved”, not necessarily so
with DiCaprio’s.
Just as the title suggests, “The Revenant” tells the story of
one who returns from the dead: in this case, the story of Hugh Glass (Leonardo
DiCaprio) in 1823 North America after a bear attack. Glass had travelled up the
Missouri River under the command of Captain Andrew Henry (Domhnall Gleeson)
with a group of roughly 50 men. They were there to trap beaver and to return
the pelts for their payoff. As they broke camp, all the while packing their
beaver pelts, they are beset by a tribe of the Ariakara. Most of the white men were
killed; those few that survived included Henry, Glass, his half-Pawnee son Hawk
(Forrest Goodluck), and about 10 others. Amongst the other survivors was young
Jim Bridger (Will Poulter) and a particularly evil-tempered John Fitzgerald
(Tom Hardy).
The group flees the Ariakara on their boat but only for a
short distance down the river. Glass quickly advised that they must abandon the
boat for a hike across the mountains to their ultimate refuge, Fort Kiowa. It
is on this journey that Glass while out hunting will find himself between two
grizzly cubs and their mother. The ensuing scene as the mother bear seeks to
"protect" her cubs is one of the most riveting and technically perfect scenes of
special effects I have ever seen. It may haunt your dreams for some time to
come. Glass will survive but only just. Unable to carry him to Fort Kiowa, Captain
Henry offers to pay any volunteer willing to stay with Glass $300. Fitzgerald,
Hawk and Bridger agree to stand watch over Glass and then to bury him when he
dies. Fitzgerald’s betrayal of this duty as well as his duty to Hawk and
Bridger will bring on the story’s major arc.
Glass will first crawl as his body is too broken to support
its own weight. He will gain some strength, painfully gain his feet, and begin
to walk in time. After several days of
this near death hike, he will meet a sympathetic Pawnee who will provide some
much needed outside, though still largely indifferent help. It is at this point that
the movie stumbles a bit. Up to the point where Hikuc (Arthur Redcloud), the
helpful Pawnee comes onto the scene, it is Glass alone against the world; now he has
help. This deviation of one man alone against nature is not my primary
complaint. Instead, it is the introduction of fantasy story elements that show up at this point in the story. They are
dressed up as fever-induced delusions, and perhaps they could have happened; but
they are a big change in the story’s tone and story-telling method.
In the first reel, “The Revenant” is a film based in
reality; a hard reality of life on the frontier battling the elements,
Native-Americans and the wildlife. In these early parts of the movie, Iñárritu
spins his story in a manner where all three, the elements, Native-Americans and
wildlife all seem more like forces of nature. There is no particular animus in any
of them towards Glass or his companions. It simply snows in winter, a mother
bear protects her cubs, or a group of Indians attack white men. There seems to
be little or no personal passion in these acts; they simply are. The bear and
the Indians might be thought to be driven by passions, and yet in the early
parts of this movie they really do not seem to have such. The Indian attacks
with his bow and arrow, the white man falls, and the Indian moves to the next victim.
No emotion, it’s just a simple act, like falling from a cliff. Gravity and the
cliff mean you no particular ill will; you die nevertheless.
The stumble in the movie occurs as Glass’ reserves, as vast
as they must be, start to wane. He hallucinates about his dead loved ones: one
will hug him, another hover above him in the air. These scenes are emotional
and they carry impact for Glass and the viewer: one scene in an abandoned
church is especially heart-rending. As good as these scenes might be in a
different movie, they feel very much out of place in a movie as grounded in
hard reality as most of “The Revenant” is. If Iñárritu truly wanted to create a
cinematic vision of the unfeeling nature of death when it comes in whatever
form it might come in, it is a mistake to switch from such a hard vision of
life to one based on a hallucinatory view of life.
Iñárritu will turn back to reality in the final reel of “The
Revenant” as Glass seeks his long delayed justice for the wrongs committed by
Fitzgerald. The movie will end with a close up on DiCaprio’s face that will,
like the bear attack live in my mind for a considerable length of time. The
look on DiCaprio’s face says so much about what he has gone through and hints
at what may become of him. By this point in his character’s life, he has gained
some measure of vengeance but has lost virtually everything else. In this
cinematic world, one must wonder “what does Glass have left to live for”? And
if that is true for Glass, one could surely imagine, this is one of Iñárritu’s
core themes in “The Revenant”: finding the will to put one foot in front of the
other, or to quote Glass once again: “You breathe…keep breathing”. This is what
I believe is Iñárritu’s actual desire for this movie’s effect on his audience.
DiCaprio’s acting is absolutely the best of the year: his 2016
Oscar for Best Actor was not a “gimme” for his years of unrewarded excellence;
years that largely began in 2004 with the “The Aviator”, 2006 with “Blood
Diamond” and “The Departed”, and continues up through this movie with too many more
to list. He earned the award long before “The Revenant” and could have been
given it for either of the 2006 films. That being said, he more than earned it
with his bravura performance in “The Revenant”. And I must say, as much as I
regard DiCaprio’s acting, I have on multiple occasions derided Tom Hardy’s; not
this time. Hardy’s performance as the evil Fitzgerald is quite noteworthy and
is part of why this movie is as good as it is.
Great acting, great cinematography, an excellent score and a
brilliant script that works with concepts as deep as “the will to live when all
feels lost” make this movie one for the ages. It is a violent movie at times,
there is no way to soft peddle that concept. However, “The Revenant” like a few
other works of art that use violence (e.g. Cormac McCarthy’s novel, “Blood Meridian”), makes violence a powerful story tool, almost a movie character; an
essential character to properly tell this story of survival, of love, of
vengeance. This story is worth knowing and Iñárritu’s vision of the story is
one worth experiencing. Even if you abhor movies with violence, consider seeing
this film. It is a movie that brings so much to the screen, it simply must be
seen.
No comments:
Post a Comment