Showing posts with label Don DeLillo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Don DeLillo. Show all posts

Thursday, May 5, 2016

Book Review: "Falling Man" by Don DeLillo


Falling Man (2007)

4 Stars out of 5

Don DeLillo

256 pages

Don DeLillo started writing somewhat late in life after having started his life in an Italian/Catholic neighborhood in the Bronx. Considering his penchant for writing on the American way of life and who is it that tells that story, it is tempting to search for some of his inspiration from these early years. DeLillo would disagree: he points to jazz, cinema greats such as Scorcese, Kubrick and others, and of course to certain authors like Joyce and O’Connor. He seems to feel that historically the job of communicating to and about American society was best held by novelists; perhaps best of all by modernist writers such Faulkner and Hemingway or such post-modernist writers as Pynchon (a writer that DeLillo has been both praised by and compared to by others). But after the assassination of JFK in 1963, DeLillo feels an era was begun that consisted of a “…series of catastrophes…” and that this created in Americans a sense of “fatality, widespread suspicion, of mistrust…” DeLillo has perhaps compared these changes in stark contrast to his happy and contented suburban childhood to form an opinion of the writer as “the Bad Guy”, as someone who “must oppose systems… power, corporations, the State, the whole system of consumption, and of debilitating entertainments”.

DeLillo has taken up his challenge of being the “Bad Guy” and written 17 novels. He has twice been a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize in Fiction (“Mao II” in 1992 and “Underworld” in 1998). His early novels from the 1970’s were generally light and somewhat comic in several cases, but starting with his 8th novel “White Noise” (1985) he started down a darker path, and he gained a critical stature that had not previously been his. He stayed on this path with “Libra” (1988), a fictionalized account of Lee Harvey Oswald, with “Mao II” (1991) and its account of how novelists function in a media- and terrorist-dominated society, and with his best regarded novel, his 11th “Underworld” (1997) and its depiction of America during the Cold War. After “Underworld” his novels begin to shrink in length and critical approval. He has written another six novels since “Underworld”. In 2001 he published “Cosmopolis” just after the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the US by Islamic terrorists. And while this book has been compared to Joyce for its updating of “Ulysses” from Ireland to modern America, it was also criticized for among others things being insensitive to the effects of 9/11. In 2007, his next novel took on this daunting subject and in typical DeLillo fashion he wound within the story of the falling of the twin towers an intimate story of a marriage unraveling, the curious story of a performance artist (rather than the mass media) re-telling a part of the 9/11 catastrophe, and he does it all while employing a tone that emphasizes the desensitization to violence and to life in general that is going on within modern America.

“Falling Man” begins with an ash covered man with an “unfocused gaze” carrying a briefcase stumbling to a halt in the street; too tired, too injured to go further he collapse onto the curb. Improbably, a New Yorker stops his truck and asks if he can give the hurt man a lift somewhere. Thus begins DeLillo’s attempt to tell a story that describes the 9/11 attack on America, and to do it by giving “…memory, tenderness, and meaning to all that howling space”. The man covered in ash is Keith Neudecker, a 39 year old lawyer that worked in the World Trade Center. His Good Samaritan takes him to the home of Keith’s estranged wife Lianne and their son Justin. Keith begins his physical and emotional recovery with a reluctant Lianne. As Keith begins his recovery we meet Lianne’s harsh-spoken mother, Nina and her European (and perhaps former German terrorist) Martin. Keith regains his strength and seeks out the owner of the briefcase he absent-mindedly picked up in the evacuation of the buildings. She is Florence, a “light-skinned Black woman”. Keith begins a relationship with Florence, not for sex but rather for the sharing of memories, the altered reality they separately experienced in the stairwells fleeing the WTC. Lianne spends much of her time leading an Alzheimer’s group in a therapy based on journaling. Those in her care struggle to remember the events of their lives or even of their day in order to complete their journals. In the latter parts of the novel, Keith largely leaves Lianne in order to participate in a World Poker Tournament, while Lianne has several occasions to observe a street artist re-enacting via a safety harness an AP photograph by Richard Drew of a man falling from one of the towers on 9/11.

This book is replete with multiple layers and artful language. The title and characterization of Keith suggest Keith’s personality disintegration. That Keith goes from a lawyer and amateur poker player to a professional player by the book’s end is of course just the edge of the book’s message. Is Keith’s reconstruction a function of 9/11 or of how its story is told is closer to one of the core truths of this book. DeLillo’s search for a novelist’s attempt to interpret the meaning is found in this book instead to come from the street artist Lianne observes. There is no tenderness; there is no meaning, only spectacle to these acts. Like the mass media that reproduced the photograph of the actual falling man for a short period after 9/11, there is only the cold depiction of a man falling to his death. What meaning there is from that event will not come from the photograph or from the performance artist. There is only a numbing of the collective mind to the violence and loss of innocence that took place on that day. The terrorist and the mass media work together to create on a large scale Keith’s “unfocused gaze”.

This is perhaps best illustrated by the three children in “Falling Man”, one of which is Keith’s son Justin. He and two peers spend their afternoons staring through binoculars for “Bill Lawton”. It is with difficulty that the reader and Keith decipher that the children impressed with the fear and confusion of 9/11 are looking for bin Laden. The kids explain they learned Bill Lawtons’ name from the TV. The poignancy of their fear is one thing, but the continual distortion of events by the mass media is yet another. This distance and disconnection between the people, the events of their lives and those that tell the details of those events speak of the times we live in. Fragmented language and distorted vision are the new tools of communication. The acts of terrorists are certainly bad enough in themselves, but this cloud of misinformation and obfuscation is quite another. We live as a people with an unfocused gaze. Courtesy of the mass media’s re-telling of events, we like Lianne’s Alzheimer patients struggle to remember the actual events of our lives, or at least their true meanings and emotional impact.

DeLillo’s desire to tell stories such as 9/11 free of “the mercies of analogy or simile” reaches its climax in those stairwells of the WTC. Opening the book as he did with an anonymous Keith falling to his knees in the ash-covered streets of Manhattan, out of context and meaning; DeLillo gives the meaning and the emotion felt by the immediate victims as some rushed down and others up the stairwell. Here the reader finds and feels the pain and confusion of the people. There is no analogy or simile, only simple experiences that have value for us all. DeLillo amply demonstrates with these closing pages that the novelist can still tell the true story of an America as “…a time and space of falling ash and near night”. DeLillo has been criticized as having left the broad panoramas of his earlier masterpieces (Underworld, Mao II, Libra), but by focusing on the close-ups of domestic life and its tediousness coupled with glimpses of the how the outside world crosses with the individual, he accomplishes something new and valuable about world views. Is the average American re-constructing himself from a group mentality, one created by the mass media – watching the politics of the new millennium, does one really have to wonder? DeLillo has taken up his challenge to the writers of the world and sounded both his clarion call to wake up, and has at the same time created an empathic picture, a small one of those that experienced 9/11 first hand. This is a book well worth reading for its exploration of the events of 9/11 as well as one from which to learn about the underworld of modern life.

Saturday, August 15, 2015

Book Review: "Underworld" by Don DeLillo


Underworld (1997)

5 Stars out of 5

Don DeLillo

Don DeLillo has constructed a modern masterpiece with his novel, "Underworld", a novel about American life in the second half of the twentieth century. This very ambitious and very long (827 pages) novel begins with a beautifully written prolog that describes “the shot heard around the world”, that is the 1951 play-off game between the NY Giants and the Brooklyn Dodgers. This prolog is a marvelous introduction to the novel as it sets into play one of the sub-plots within the book, uses spot on dialog that is key to the era and the characters, but even more importantly, as it introduces the reader to the consummate literary skill that DeLillo employs throughout the entire novel.

“Underworld” as a title seems to suggest something sinister, but in fact refers to a metaphorical burying of things best left in the past. The primary protagonist, Nick Shay commits a murder while still a youth, spends some time in detention, but grows to adulthood where he finds a career as an executive for a waste management company; a career that is unmistakably consistent with the title and theme of the novel. The book’s storyline that involves Nick’s middle-age describes a man with a failing marriage; a troubled man worried about himself, his marriage, and the concept of literally burying trash as well as his attempt to metaphorically bury his own dark secret. DeLillo does not take the reader straight from the baseball game in 1951 to Nick’s twilight years in a linear fashion. Rather, he sets the 1950’s scene in the prolog and then jumps to the early twenty-first century and Nick. He then works backward, almost decade by decade, back to the early fifties to when Nick commits his crime. The reader learns of Nick’s consequences long before his crime is made clear. The reader knows there has been a crime, knows Nick is broken in some manner, but lacks the details and must decipher the clues as a normal person would when meeting someone for the first time. The story is told in the third person omniscient, but the narrator keeps some of his secrets to the book’s ending.

DeLillo’s use of time sequencing for “Underworld” is a challenge to the reader. It is very easy due to DeLillo’s marvelous storytelling and dialog to lose oneself in any of the vignettes that make up “Underworld”. But then as a certain pace is built within one of the sub-stories, a certain dramatic tension created, DeLillo concludes the chapter and storyline in question and quickly jumps to another character within the novel, or possibly jumps to an earlier decade entirely, maybe with the same character from the previous chapter, perhaps with a completely new character. This is a challenge to the reader in a manner that kept me thinking of James Joyce’s “Ulysses” or Thomas Pynchon’s “Gravity’s Rainbow”. DeLillo doesn’t use Joyce’s almost hallucinogenic style of prose wherein seemingly nearly random thoughts frequently penetrate the storyline (see also Toni Morrison’s “Beloved” for more of this style). Instead DeLillo uses a complex series of sub-stories (not hallucinogenic but definitely complex) to tell a tale of remarkable character complexity; so complex a set of stories and characters, that dedicated attention is required of the reader to make sense of the overall story. “Underworld” surely was far from easy to write, it is quite necessarily difficult to read.

A casual reader though could still take great pleasure in merely reading short sections of the book. Such a reader could (as noted above) enjoy the crisp prose and dialog, or find interest in some of the stories embedded in the overall novel. Consider the opening prolog wherein DeLillo describes in careful detail how Ralph Branca pitching for the Dodgers gave up a winning homerun to the Giants’ Bobby Thompson. By itself a riveting and dramatic story the way DeLillo tells it. But he also manages to include a strange little sub-story within that includes J. Edgar Hoover and his fascination with a painting by Bruegel, some wisecracking by Jackie Gleason, and a somewhat tension filled walk home by a young African American man that obtained the winning fly ball. Other stories that stand by themselves include one from the early sixties that describes the terror that filled the air as America and the Soviet Union appeared to be on a one-way street to nuclear oblivion; and incredibly, DeLillo uses Lenny Bruce as a contemporary comedian to use his acerbic humor as the narrator of those fears. Another excellent story, this one from the seventies involves an older married woman from Nick’s past, one with whom he had sexual relations as a teen, she is now a mature artist; an artist directing the artistic  painting of retired US Air Force bombers; bombers that were once part of America’s nuclear deterrent in the sixties.

“Underworld” does have an overall arc, one told in an inverse time order. Besides the story of Nick’s adult life and how he got there, it also tells the story of the winning fly ball and the various people that seek to own it. But mostly DeLillo is creating a picture of America in the last half of the twentieth century. And he is using a writing style that might be compared to a painting style such as pointillism, or even more accurately as an artform such as a kind of “mosaicism”; a kind of mosaic where each part of the mosaic is made up of an individual picture. The reader/ viewer can look at each piece of the mosaic and enjoy it for its own sake, or step back, so to speak, and enjoy the overall picture.  And this big picture is America at a certain contented/fraught time in its history. A time filled with kids opening fire hydrants to play in during the summer heat, a different time where one might drive through the back woods while simultaneously worrying about nuclear destruction and participating in the hedonistic lifestyle of the hippy era, or yet another time, this one that includes the encroaching internet, a time where one never feels alone and disconnected, maybe when one never feels at peace.

These nostalgic and bittersweet views of American life coupled with the real terror of the Cold War and the possibly equally terrifying loss of privacy era we now live in are done by DeLillo in a manner that allows the reader to dip into this majestic book and enjoy. Enjoy it for a brief swim through one of these eras for nostalgic sake, for a historical perspective, or if the reader is too young to have lived in these eras, for an educational lesson. In some ways, this novel is like a magnum of fine wine; one could try to drink it down all at once, but why do so? Sip it, and take pleasure in the work of one of America’s best novelists from the late twentieth century.