Showing posts with label memoir. Show all posts
Showing posts with label memoir. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Book Review: "When Breath Becomes Air" by Paul Kalanithi

When Breath Becomes Air (2016)
5 Stars out of 5
Paul Kalanithi
208 pages
“Even if I’m dying, until I actually die, I’m still living.”
“The main message of Jesus, I believed, is that mercy trumps justice every time.”
Paul Kalanithi
How does one approach the subject of death, especially when it is one’s own death? We all live with the knowledge that our day will come, but by not knowing the “when” of it, permits us to live a kind of fantasy that says, “Well, someday, but not today”, i.e. never. In the case of Stanford neurosurgeon resident, Paul Kalanithi, nearing the end of his multi-year training in medicine, it is a question that had gained vital urgency some twenty-two months previously when he learned that he had inoperable lung cancer. The manner in which Paul faced the question of "How to live a life of purpose" is a lesson for everyone. His journey from Chief Resident to patient is an example that one mightily hopes could be taught in med school, or indeed to the public at large. Everyone should read this book.
 Paul begins his book writing to a friend about the cancer with the fluid prose and gentle humor than infuses the book as a whole: 
 “The good news is that I’ve already outlived two Brontës, Keats and Stephen Crane. The bad news is that I haven’t written anything.”
By beginning the book in this manner, he is signaling to his readers several points that play a major role in who Paul Kalanithi is and was, a man with lofty ambitions, a man determined to live his life as long as he was living and also an allusion to his past as a student of literature; an alluded topic that would strongly inform his 2016 memoir “When Breath Becomes Air” and also provide a lovely segue to the opening sections of that memoir.
Paul began his life in Westchester NY as the second child to a successful cardiologist. Suddenly, or it must have seemed so to the youthful Paul, his father moved the family to Kingman AZ. It is hard to imagine two worlds further apart. And yet it provided Paul with an opportunity that he might have otherwise missed: homeschooling with his mother. Paul left behind the incredible school system in NY for what was essentially private tutoring in AZ. Paul refers in his memoir to the literature his mother encouraged him to read (to help him prepare for college) as the key component to his education. He became fascinated with how artists looked at the question of “what is the meaning of life and how one should live it”. He will go on to earn two B.A.s and a M.A. in literature at Stanford, and just for good measure a M.A. in philosophy at Cambridge before starting his medical training.
He started his training in literature and philosophy as he pursued his quest to understand better how one lives his life. As he neared the end of his artistic tenure at Stanford, he came to the conclusion that he needed to understand the “how” of the human mind, not just the “why”. He would return from Cambridge to earn his M.D. at Yale and to meet his wife to be, Lucy; she too would become a physician and would in fact finish his unfinished memoir. She would become an internist while Paul would train to become a neurosurgeon, both at Stanford.
Paul’s memoir’s reflection of life as a physician in training is interesting in its own right. Consider his description of life in his first day as an intern where during his rotation in OB/GYN he helped give birth to a pair of severely premature twin boys – two boys who would begin and end their short lives on the same day as Paul’s first day. It is a sobering moment in the book as the reader feels most acutely Paul’s empathy for his patients, and also how this tragic day for those twins’ parents aligns so well with the core message of this book’s discussion of life and death.
Paul will also describe how in his early years as a med student/intern he continued his struggle to understand the role of physician and the role of the patient in how we all view death:
“Death comes for all of us. For us, for our patients: it is our fate as living, breathing, metabolizing organisms. Most lives are lived with passivity toward death -- it's something that happens to you and those around you. But Jeff and I had trained for years to actively engage with death, to grapple with it, like Jacob with the angel, and, in so doing, to confront the meaning of a life. We had assumed an onerous yoke, that of mortal responsibility. Our patients' lives and identities may be in our hands, yet death always wins. Even if you are perfect, the world isn't. The secret is to know that the deck is stacked, that you will lose, that your hands or judgment will slip, and yet still struggle to win for your patients. You can't ever reach perfection, but you can believe in an asymptote toward which you are ceaselessly striving.”
These early parts of the memoir are all written from the vantage point of the caring physician, but that will all change once Paul is given his earth-shattering diagnosis of stage 4 lung cancer; his perspective changes radically. He will enter the same hospital and the same hospital rooms where days before he had led as chief resident, but this time as a patient. He will now be treated by attending physicians and nurses he knew as colleagues. He will also in time find out first-hand how mistakes are made as a young oncology resident mistakenly stops a drug than had been keeping Paul alive. He will survive that experience only to return to his immediate situation: he wants to live each day as anyone would, but how many does he have; he knows it is few, but just how few?
“Grand illnesses are supposed to be life-clarifying. Instead, I knew I was going to die—but I’d known that before. My state of knowledge was the same, but my ability to make lunch plans had been shot to hell. The way forward would seem obvious, if only I knew how many months or years I had left. Tell me three months, I’d spend time with family. Tell me one year, I’d write a book. Give me ten years, I’d get back to treating diseases. The truth that you live one day at a time didn’t help: What was I supposed to do with that day?”
That Paul was a polymath, someone brilliant in his multiple fields of literature, philosophy and medicine plays a terribly important role in this book. This is not just an average Joe looking death in the eye, but a man who had and still lived to his final day a fully examined life. His academic achievements underscore this point, but it is this incredible elegiac book that makes the point all so clearly. His wife will provide an epilog that comes with her own narrative flow, but one that is consistent with that of Paul’s. The book also comes with a forward from a fellow Stanford physician Abraham Verghese. I do not deny Dr. Verghese’s writing talents or his enthusiasm for Paul’s work, but the tone of his forward felt awkwardly out of place with the book that follows. My opinion is to skip the forward and read the book and epilog first, and then return to the forward. It will be less tonally jarring. But however you decide to read this book, I strongly recommend that you do so. It may be the best book you read from 2016.
Below is a picture of Paul, his wife Lucy and the daughter Cady they conceived after he knew he was to die. Their discussion on this point is heartbreaking and enlightening and the same time.

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Book Review: "Middlesex" by Jeffrey Eugenides

Middlesex (2002)

Four Stars out of Five

Jeffery Eugenides

Jeffery Eugenides has crafted an amazing/frustrating amalgam of a Pulitzer Prize winning (2003) novel in the form of “Middlesex”. This book like its protagonist Callie/Cal is a pastiche of styles, themes, voices, strengths and weaknesses. It is so much in my opinion a juncture of two separate books, that I would like to give the first half five stars out of five, but consign the second half to a mere two or three stars out of five; I will settle for my own pastiche and give it a mean value of four stars out of five.

Eugenides has commented that “Middlesex” contains many parts that come from his own life, though not the premier characteristic of his hero/heroine Cal/Callie. “Middlesex” tells the story of three generations of the Stephanides family. It begins with their departure from Asia Minor where grandparents Eleutherios (Lefty) and Desdemona must leave their silk worm farm via the burning of Smyrna following WWI for America. Once in America, they join up with cousin Sourmelina (Lina) in Detroit to raise their two children Milton and Zoe. The novel details the Greek immigrants’ experience in Detroit and contrasts it to the African-American experience in the same city by discussing the origins of auto manufacture, the origins of Black Muslims (Nation of Islam), and the race riots in the 60’s. The story leads up to Milton’s own children with his cousin Tessie, Chapter Eleven (yes that his name) and Calliope (later Cal).

The first half of the book is in many ways a brilliant portrait of an immigrant family and the powerful forces that led them to flee their homeland in Bithhynos on the slopes of Mount Olympus in Asia Minor/Turkey. We are introduced to life in a rural, inbred town where the ethnic Greeks are definitely not integrated into the larger Turkish culture that surrounds them. As they leave their home, barely making it out alive, the reader is introduced to the conditions of that that small inbred town, how it permits, if not indeed compels Lefty to marry his sister Desdemona, and how this literal defiance of natural law and metaphorical defiance of the Gods leads to the genetic mutation that lies at the root of Callie’s/Cal’s life two generations later.

Once in America, Lefty and Desdemona conceal their consanguinity from all except their cousin Lina; she who has her own secret (Lesbianism), the newlyweds will hold in secret as a quid pro quo for Lina keeping their secret. As Lefty and Desdemona begin their life in Detroit, the reader is exposed to the history of Detroit, some of the teachings of The Nation of Islam and the race riots in the Detroit of 1967. Those riots lead to an insurance-borne bounty for the Stephanides family and their White flight from Detroit to the enclave of Grosse Point. The Stephanides experience their own exposure to ethnic-based prejudice when they try to buy their new home, but still fail to understand the rage and frustration of the Blacks they just fled. In Grosse Point, the formerly cute Callie (or Calliope, muse of heroic poetry in Greek mythology) begins to feel the effects of the mutation she has inherited. This mutation has placed her into an “intersex” category but has heretofore gone unseen by all around her, doctors and family alike. The problem for Callie is that her mutation is now starting to masculinize her, and right at a most difficult time for Callie as she has just enrolled into a cliquish prep school for girls. Her problems compound as she finds herself irresistibly drawn to another girl. Through a series of misadventures Callie learns of her genetic endowment, decides to live as a male and to flee her home. The story concludes in a somewhat rushed manner with the now middle-aged Cal living in the formerly divided Berlin as a man working for the US government.

There are two themes that dominate this story: rebirth and nature versus nurture. There are also some very interesting thematic elements in the story such as how polar opposites (e.g. male and female) experience the same events and also how the use of Greek mythology is used to expand many of the ideas in the book. The rebirth theme is quite probably the most key theme throughout this story: the Greek immigrants’ rebirth as Americans and Callie’s rebirth as Cal. The contrast between these two transformations is quite clever and helps to knit the first half of the book to the second. How Callie came to be transformed from a girl into a boy is discussed at length as a nature versus nurture argument. While I enjoyed the discussion, I am far from convinced that Science has come to as clear a conclusion as Cal did in terms of his decision to opt for maleness. Most especially disturbing was the weight he (living as a she) placed on his sexual orientation for females – this seems a rank dismissal of gay orientations as being little more than misplaced genitalia; a concept that I do not believe is embraced by modern medicine in any manner.

The polar opposite experiences of male versus female is I think another prime feature of this book. Eugenides worked hard to create a novel first person voice for an adolescent Callie and for the middle-aged Cal. Indeed, the voice he uses for Cal as he describes the thoughts of his ancestors in the first person when clearly he could not have known them is couched in two very interesting ways. On the one hand, Hermaphroditus the Greek from mythology that Cal most clearly aligns himself with had the ability to know and to feel empathy with his ancestors, and then in addition through his use of ironic language, Eugenides lets it be known he is being somewhat facetious and that Cal must be regarded as an unreliable narrator.

The use of Greek mythology is also very cleverly used by Eugenides. Consider how on the night of Callie’s conception, her parents were attending a play called The Minotaur; this half bull, half man is but one example of the divided natures of so many parts of “Middlesex”. Other significant examples of Greek mythology would include the aforementioned Hermaphroditus’ abilities, Calliope as both a Greek muse of heroics and her namesake as the book’s narrator of her own heroics, but I think one of the cleverest is the role played by Callie as Tiresias in her school’s play. This Greek character also displayed in her life dual natures as male and female, but also acted as a seer and fore-teller of things unseen; again a hearkening to Hermaphroditus’ similar abilities.

The problems with the book that I had were that it was almost like two books. Book 1 dealt as a family saga or historical novel on the life and times of Greek immigrants in mid-20th century America, while Book two dealt in far less a compelling way with the Callie’s transformation. This latter book was done as Bildungsroman type of story and was done in a far too wordy manner. And yet despite being too verbose, one could easily complain that it was not as easy to follow Callie’s transformation let alone Cal’s final denouement as easily as it was to follow his/her family’s adventures in part 1. Another criticism is the one already leveled in terms of Callie’s decision to live as Cal. This aspect of the book is particularly ironic as Eugenides has stated publicly that his primary motivation in writing of Callie’s intersex nature was his own dissatisfaction with a memoir written by an actual intersex individual in the 19th century (“Herculin Barbin”).

Those comments aside, “Middlesex” is a brilliant book that brings a unique voice to the narrator, speaks compelling of the immigrant experience and helps to shed some light on the lives of one group of American still struggling to gain acceptance and understanding from the wider community around them; that is to say those not fitting neatly into strictly defined sexual categories, those of an intersex category. This book is not for everyone, but for those of you interested in the immigrant experience or in unique narrative styles, this book might well be of some interest.